<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why White Label?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diorex.com/why-white-label/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diorex.com/why-white-label/</link>
	<description>Random Musings about Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uber Affiliate Marketing Guide &#124; UberAffiliate - We Hate 9-5 Jobs As Much As You Do</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/why-white-label/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Uber Affiliate Marketing Guide &#124; UberAffiliate - We Hate 9-5 Jobs As Much As You Do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/why-white-label/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] Why White Label? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why White Label? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diorex</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/why-white-label/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>diorex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/why-white-label/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Leadpoint meets many of the requirements of a white label, except perhaps the most important. It takes a decent sized percentage as a fee for matching buyers and sellers. Re-read the point on Getting Paid to understand how this seemingly small fee can mean huge difference in your returns.

I would recommend leadpoint as a means to prove volume, but then to go straight to the end buyer ASAP. Middlemen just eat your profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leadpoint meets many of the requirements of a white label, except perhaps the most important. It takes a decent sized percentage as a fee for matching buyers and sellers. Re-read the point on Getting Paid to understand how this seemingly small fee can mean huge difference in your returns.</p>
<p>I would recommend leadpoint as a means to prove volume, but then to go straight to the end buyer ASAP. Middlemen just eat your profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/why-white-label/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 08:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/why-white-label/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Check out LeadPoint (www.leadpoint.com) if you do any lead-gen. It's the ultimate as far as a white label program...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out LeadPoint (www.leadpoint.com) if you do any lead-gen. It&#8217;s the ultimate as far as a white label program&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/why-white-label/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/why-white-label/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I guess the real problem is getting to the point where you are pushing enough volume for it to be worth the merchant's time.  I'm still far away from that point, but hope to get there eventually.  All the big players should be doing this - it just makes too much sense not to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the real problem is getting to the point where you are pushing enough volume for it to be worth the merchant&#8217;s time.  I&#8217;m still far away from that point, but hope to get there eventually.  All the big players should be doing this - it just makes too much sense not to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

