<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ugly underbelly of affiliate marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/</link>
	<description>Random Musings about Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wal-Mart and E-Bay Experiments a leading indicator? &#171; Random Musings about making $$$ on the net.</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Wal-Mart and E-Bay Experiments a leading indicator? &#171; Random Musings about making $$$ on the net.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] that with my recent post about a major company who admitted to me they dont care about their affiliates, blockbusters recent pullback on payouts and I am seeing a pattern start to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that with my recent post about a major company who admitted to me they dont care about their affiliates, blockbusters recent pullback on payouts and I am seeing a pattern start to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oomph</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>oomph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>This sounds like -deleted- all the way.

Edited: Please do not guess at the company in comments. I will delete all future comments like this. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like -deleted- all the way.</p>
<p>Edited: Please do not guess at the company in comments. I will delete all future comments like this. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixie77</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixie77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Diorex,

Good to see you back! Always loved your blog!

So what company X expects is bunch of small affiliates to test out their offer &amp; spend $100, at best make $75 back? Am I understanding correctly? With this strategy super affiliates won't go for long - so they in good shape. Numbers don't add up &amp; we move on.

So, seems like the strategy is to run through as many affiliates as they can, correct?
What industry is this in? Any tips how to avoid those programs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diorex,</p>
<p>Good to see you back! Always loved your blog!</p>
<p>So what company X expects is bunch of small affiliates to test out their offer &amp; spend $100, at best make $75 back? Am I understanding correctly? With this strategy super affiliates won&#8217;t go for long - so they in good shape. Numbers don&#8217;t add up &amp; we move on.</p>
<p>So, seems like the strategy is to run through as many affiliates as they can, correct?<br />
What industry is this in? Any tips how to avoid those programs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Companies get what they pay for. In most cases there is a substitute affiliate program/offer for their same product. If they are comfortable with the competition getting a gigantic percentage of the affiliate driven traffic for their market, so be it. If a companies number don't work for me, forget it. They might get a sliver of traffic but the rest is going from their competition from then on and someone is going to have to beg me multiple times to even try them out again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies get what they pay for. In most cases there is a substitute affiliate program/offer for their same product. If they are comfortable with the competition getting a gigantic percentage of the affiliate driven traffic for their market, so be it. If a companies number don&#8217;t work for me, forget it. They might get a sliver of traffic but the rest is going from their competition from then on and someone is going to have to beg me multiple times to even try them out again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dar</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Dar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Good to see you back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>That's not surprising at all. Just looking at certain rules for promoting some companies. It sets it up like you got to kiss there ass to work hard to send them leads. I know a few companies that I absolutely refuse to send them leads due to their terms. Then again affiliate companies that manage are not much better. If something converts VERY well and you're killing it they always lower the payouts and you take it in the behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not surprising at all. Just looking at certain rules for promoting some companies. It sets it up like you got to kiss there ass to work hard to send them leads. I know a few companies that I absolutely refuse to send them leads due to their terms. Then again affiliate companies that manage are not much better. If something converts VERY well and you&#8217;re killing it they always lower the payouts and you take it in the behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirvan</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-ugly-underbelly-of-affiliate-marketing/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Amazing. Someone told me about this a month ago and he runs an affiliate program. He told me the same, let all the affiliates spend the money on advertising. Sad but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing. Someone told me about this a month ago and he runs an affiliate program. He told me the same, let all the affiliates spend the money on advertising. Sad but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
