<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google IP Address Exclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diorex.com/google-ip-address-exclusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diorex.com/google-ip-address-exclusion/</link>
	<description>Random Musings about Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: diorex</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/google-ip-address-exclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>diorex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/06/15/google-ip-address-exclusion/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>@Lyme - We already do this for some competitors to protect landing pages. The Google tool allows us to protect our ad copy which has been pirated more than once, as well as to keep those pesky networks from clicking on our ads. One in particular clicked 300 times last month on a $3 keyword and more than 2000 times in the last year. No idea if Google filters those clicks or not, but I would just as soon not have the hassle of wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lyme - We already do this for some competitors to protect landing pages. The Google tool allows us to protect our ad copy which has been pirated more than once, as well as to keep those pesky networks from clicking on our ads. One in particular clicked 300 times last month on a $3 keyword and more than 2000 times in the last year. No idea if Google filters those clicks or not, but I would just as soon not have the hassle of wondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyme_waxster</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/google-ip-address-exclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>lyme_waxster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 02:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/06/15/google-ip-address-exclusion/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>If your main concern is the viewing of your content, and not the cost of the clicks, then why not just cloak/re-direct the undesireables via htaccess?  No limit of 20 there either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your main concern is the viewing of your content, and not the cost of the clicks, then why not just cloak/re-direct the undesireables via htaccess?  No limit of 20 there either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/google-ip-address-exclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diorex.wordpress.com/2007/06/15/google-ip-address-exclusion/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Too bad it's limit 20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad it&#8217;s limit 20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
