http://www.diorex.com/google-does-not-get-the-purpose-of-testing/ Random Musings about Internet Marketing Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:09:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://www.diorex.com/google-does-not-get-the-purpose-of-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-901 Building A List Blog Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:53:21 +0000 http://www.diorex.com/?p=167#comment-901 well, I am thinking that Google is not concern with that. We are all concern but they're not. well, I am thinking that Google is not concern with that.
We are all concern but they’re not.

]]> http://www.diorex.com/google-does-not-get-the-purpose-of-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-891 matt Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:45:37 +0000 http://www.diorex.com/?p=167#comment-891 @John - he already said why multiple adgroups wasn't the same. Read the article before doing hit-n-run noob lecture posts like you do everywhere else. @John - he already said why multiple adgroups wasn’t the same. Read the article before doing hit-n-run noob lecture posts like you do everywhere else.

]]> http://www.diorex.com/google-does-not-get-the-purpose-of-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-726 Banner Blindness Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:39:14 +0000 http://www.diorex.com/?p=167#comment-726 Im not really concerned, as now everyone is subjected to the same rules, so whats the problem - this is a world of competition. I do understand that your hidden gem was found by rotating URLS in the same adgroup - why not just open multiple adgroups? Give me a call when your in Chicago next time: 312-281-8931 John@BannerBlindness.com Im not really concerned, as now everyone is subjected to the same rules, so whats the problem - this is a world of competition. I do understand that your hidden gem was found by rotating URLS in the same adgroup - why not just open multiple adgroups? Give me a call when your in Chicago next time: 312-281-8931 John@BannerBlindness.com

]]> http://www.diorex.com/google-does-not-get-the-purpose-of-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-712 Bryan Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:03:40 +0000 http://www.diorex.com/?p=167#comment-712 This bothers me too, and I doubt there's much we can do it about it now. I guess our next best alternative would be to split-test URLs in Yahoo and hope that the data holds when we bring the winners back to G? This bothers me too, and I doubt there’s much we can do it about it now. I guess our next best alternative would be to split-test URLs in Yahoo and hope that the data holds when we bring the winners back to G?

]]> http://www.diorex.com/google-does-not-get-the-purpose-of-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-706 Jack Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:52:29 +0000 http://www.diorex.com/?p=167#comment-706 Millions or dollars per month, eh? LMAO, riggght Millions or dollars per month, eh? LMAO, riggght

]]> http://www.diorex.com/google-does-not-get-the-purpose-of-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-705 Shock Marketer Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:15:30 +0000 http://www.diorex.com/?p=167#comment-705 I've been concerned about this as well. Since affiliates would be the ones that predominantly test different domains, maybe Google isn't that concerned? I’ve been concerned about this as well. Since affiliates would be the ones that predominantly test different domains, maybe Google isn’t that concerned?

]]> http://www.diorex.com/google-does-not-get-the-purpose-of-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-704 Ad Hustler Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:03:39 +0000 http://www.diorex.com/?p=167#comment-704 I am definitely concerned. Rotating URLs for testing does not hard user experience and allows us to optimize our campaigns so it makes little sense for G to mess with this. I am definitely concerned. Rotating URLs for testing does not hard user experience and allows us to optimize our campaigns so it makes little sense for G to mess with this.

]]>