<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Dont be Evil&#8221; but intentionally deceptive is ok</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/</link>
	<description>Random Musings about Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Odero</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Odero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-918</guid>
		<description>yeah good point Odero, when I press Delete on my keyboard, the text disappears too. It's gone. Not sure why Adwords should operate any differently to any other system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah good point Odero, when I press Delete on my keyboard, the text disappears too. It&#8217;s gone. Not sure why Adwords should operate any differently to any other system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odero</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Odero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-800</guid>
		<description>I have been programming for  the last 3 years and the 'delete' function has never meant an item is available afterwards. One requirement i had once is that delete means 'archive', that means its not available in the user interface and can only be retrieved by the administrator through special means. Once still(in google's case), 'deleted' can never mean 'paused' by all means!

@Fin Keegan, I agree, google, which WAS a small and smart company has surely grown into a big and dumb company. A sure sign that somebody is soon taking over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been programming for  the last 3 years and the &#8216;delete&#8217; function has never meant an item is available afterwards. One requirement i had once is that delete means &#8216;archive&#8217;, that means its not available in the user interface and can only be retrieved by the administrator through special means. Once still(in google&#8217;s case), &#8216;deleted&#8217; can never mean &#8216;paused&#8217; by all means!</p>
<p>@Fin Keegan, I agree, google, which WAS a small and smart company has surely grown into a big and dumb company. A sure sign that somebody is soon taking over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-797</guid>
		<description>This is a really typicall google behaviour. They have these little scams they pull very discreetly. For example if you have google ads on your own webpage, you have to reach $100 before you get paid. Google uses this rule to their advantage by closing people's account for "violations" and such and never paying out any money if they had under $100 earned. Same thing with google checkout, they close your account and you'll never get the pending payments. Can't remember the url for the article I read about google ads, but I found the one about google checkout: http://www.slash7.com/articles/2009/3/26/google-is-evil-worse-than-paypal-don-t-use-google-checkout-for-your-business 

Good article though. Google only cares about profit, that's it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really typicall google behaviour. They have these little scams they pull very discreetly. For example if you have google ads on your own webpage, you have to reach $100 before you get paid. Google uses this rule to their advantage by closing people&#8217;s account for &#8220;violations&#8221; and such and never paying out any money if they had under $100 earned. Same thing with google checkout, they close your account and you&#8217;ll never get the pending payments. Can&#8217;t remember the url for the article I read about google ads, but I found the one about google checkout: <a href="http://www.slash7.com/articles/2009/3/26/google-is-evil-worse-than-paypal-don-t-use-google-checkout-for-your-business" rel="nofollow">http://www.slash7.com/articles/2009/3/26/google-is-evil-worse-than-paypal-don-t-use-google-checkout-for-your-business</a> </p>
<p>Good article though. Google only cares about profit, that&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakesh Malik</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakesh Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-794</guid>
		<description>It's slightly surprising that there are actually people siding with Google on this, when it's clearly a case of Google pushing the penalty for a systemic bug onto their users rather than fixing and doing the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s slightly surprising that there are actually people siding with Google on this, when it&#8217;s clearly a case of Google pushing the penalty for a systemic bug onto their users rather than fixing and doing the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Did you "Hide" deleted campaigns so you could not see when Google resumed them? That does seem to be unfair on Google's part. I demand that Google fixes whatever technical glitch does not allow deleted campaigns to actually be deleted, and delete should mean delete, or not be available at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you &#8220;Hide&#8221; deleted campaigns so you could not see when Google resumed them? That does seem to be unfair on Google&#8217;s part. I demand that Google fixes whatever technical glitch does not allow deleted campaigns to actually be deleted, and delete should mean delete, or not be available at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SV</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>SV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-792</guid>
		<description>I would have to take Google's side on this. The deleted campaigns are clearly mentioned and as somebody said above when you are selecting all campaigns and clicking 'Resume' it means you want to resume all your campaigns.

While I agree there is no difference between paused and deleted, the 2 different functions exist for easier view options.

I think it's great Google offered the 50% credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to take Google&#8217;s side on this. The deleted campaigns are clearly mentioned and as somebody said above when you are selecting all campaigns and clicking &#8216;Resume&#8217; it means you want to resume all your campaigns.</p>
<p>While I agree there is no difference between paused and deleted, the 2 different functions exist for easier view options.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s great Google offered the 50% credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis Krums</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis Krums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Very interesting experience... good tip for everyone to double check their accounts and make sure they are set for least amount of damage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting experience&#8230; good tip for everyone to double check their accounts and make sure they are set for least amount of damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google in an ethical screw-up &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Google in an ethical screw-up &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-789</guid>
		<description>[...] ads they don&#8217;t want to buy. But Google doesn&#8217;t refund all the money wasted this way. Bad Google.   Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ads they don&#8217;t want to buy. But Google doesn&#8217;t refund all the money wasted this way. Bad Google.   Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-788</guid>
		<description>What campaign were you running where you were charged $10 per click?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What campaign were you running where you were charged $10 per click?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy iosifescu</title>
		<link>http://www.diorex.com/dont-be-evil-but-intentionally-deceptive-is-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>andy iosifescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diorex.com/?p=169#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Well... if there are no bugs, the users will find them!...
Too bad you had to pay for something you should have been paid for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; if there are no bugs, the users will find them!&#8230;<br />
Too bad you had to pay for something you should have been paid for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
